Saturday, November 22, 2025

I am thankful for our rising rage ...

As we come into the Thanksgiving season, I realize that I am heartened by growing rage against the offenses against our country by the Trump regime and oligarchy. These are too many to catalog. The list here is necessarily short and incomplete, but plenty infuriating.

• a deportation dragnet which empowers masked thugs to abduct harmless persons within our country for the crime of speaking another language or having brown skin;

• a plan to turn over our coastlines to oil drillers to pollute; 

• the attempted surrender of the sovereign state of Ukraine to Vladimir Putin. (Europe might yet step up; Ukrainians have no choice but to resist. I remain convinced the proper historical analogy is the democracies' betrayal of the Spanish Republic to the fascists in the 1930; the resulting regime of terror lasted 50 years in unhappy Spain.)

• Trump's claim of treason against brave office holders who reminded our military they swear fealty to the Constitution, not Donald Trump;

• and then there are ongoing skirmishes over Jeffrey Epstein's sex crimes. Beneath the noise, there's a smoldering blaze sustaining too many watching women, perhaps slow to ignite, but enduring and combustible.

Somewhat to my surprise, the New York Times has given space to a professor of literature and journalism at American University, Rachel Louise Snyder, [gift link] to lay out the case for legitimate fury among women.

... the emails are just a piece of the larger story: the lengths this country and the systems we’ve created — from the smallest jurisdiction to the national stage — will go to maintain the power of men at the expense of women’s bodies. 

... Mr. Trump is right. He has nothing to hide because he stands to lose nothing. Whatever exists in those files surely will not be enough to wrest him from his perch. At least not yet. ... [He] has overseen an era that might be unique in its willingness to sacrifice democratic institutions and American norms to control women.

As I write, there is a White House proposal that aims to lower the Office on Violence Against Women’s stature within the D.O.J. and cut its shoestring budget by nearly 30 percent. This would devastate shelters, advocacy programs and violence prevention measures, and escalate the danger for victims of intimate partner and familial violence in all corners of the country.

At the same time, a report on violent deaths of girls and women from 2014 to 2020 noted that laws constraining abortion providers were associated with a 3.4 percent rise in the rate of homicides related to intimate partner violence. We are being killed for our own lack of choice. An estimated one in 20 women in the United States gets pregnant from rape or sexual coercion, which equates to a whopping six million women with violence-initiated pregnancies. Six million. Two-thirds of the women who became pregnant from rape were injured during their assaults.

Are you as angry as I am yet? The misogyny that is such a casual part of Mr. Trump’s entire modus operandi gives license to systems that prioritize men’s freedoms over women’s lives. ...

We are entitled to demand more from our leaders, to demand an open investigation into the Epstein files, to demand accountability for the perpetrators regardless of political party or cultural cachet, to demand justice for the children and women trafficked by Mr. Epstein, and perhaps more than anything to demand actual real change in which a broken system is compelled to reinvention.

In the meantime, we are entitled to all of our rage, and men, frankly, we would welcome a moment of gratitude from you that we have not burned this whole damn human enterprise down just yet. ...

Stay mad. Rage is dangerous, but it can be righteous. Our lives depend on it.

Posting may (or may not) be sporadic over Thanksgiving week as family assembles. I expect further outrages in this time when many look away.

Friday, November 21, 2025

Friday deer blogging

 

This inquisitive youngster was attracted by seeds fallen from the bird feeders. The animal showed little distress that I was watching close by. That's too bad, since it's hunting season -- though this spot is too close to a house for hunting to be legal. Eventually what appeared to be the mother rounded up and led away her offspring.

Thursday, November 20, 2025

All together now ...

On the annual Transgender Day of Remembrance, the Human Rights Campaign writes:

The Human Rights Campaign is both saddened and infuriated by the deaths of at least thirty-two transgender and gender-expansive people whose lives were tragically and inhumanely taken through violent means, including gun and intimate partner violence, in 2024. 

... These victims, like all of us, were loving partners, parents, family members, friends and community members. They worked, went to school and attended houses of worship. They were real people who did not deserve to have their lives taken.

As we continue working toward justice and equality for trans and gender-expansive people, we celebrate the lives for those we have lost in 2024: 

The link takes you to pictures and short bios of the people killed last year. Explore it if you dare. 

As the Trump regime seeks to erase all gender-nonconforming people, it's up to those of us who can to stand alongside each other. The Trumpkins don't like any of us, but transfolk face violent erasure.

From the No Kings March, October 2025

Wednesday, November 19, 2025

Donald is sure taking a lot of hits

The pundit class consensus today seems to be that "the tide is turning" against the Donald. So opines JVL at the Bulwark and he's no cockeyed optimist. I'll be skeptical til I get around to assessing for myself what a determined observer can see. 

Meanwhile, here's JVL's list of why we just might save some broken version of American democracy. He enumerates a case that efforts to throw sand in the gears of a rising fascism might be having an impact.

  • 7 million people came out to protest the regime.

  • The administration’s shutdown of the government turned into a political liability for Trump.

  • Trump demanded that Senate Republicans get rid of the filibuster; they refused.

  • The MAGA right split on the acceptability of Nick Fuentes and his groypers.

  • Democrats won more electoral victories and by far larger margins than polling indicated they would.

  • A series of Epstein documents suggested a much closer relationship between Trump and the pedophile than was previously assumed.2

  • Four House Republicans defied direct pressure from Trump to a enact a discharge petition and override the speaker’s attempt to avoid an Epstein file vote.

  • With the petition signed, enough Republicans were going to defect that Trump had to surrender and “authorize” them to vote for the release of the Epstein files.

  • The DHS occupation of Chicago failed. The city did not bend to Trump’s will. The state prevented him from deploying an invading force of Texas National Guard troops.

  • Indiana Republicans have resisted Trump’s desire for them to redraw their congressional districts.

  • His net approval rating is -14.

Unfortunately, we'll have to see -- and must keep pushing to make it happen

Meanwhile, not considered in JVL's catalogue of Trumpian horrors, is a crypto collapse that takes down large parts of the US financial sector. Could happen. I put my money of Paul Krugman's assessment of crypto. 

 
If only this madness didn't also take down the rest of us. We're running a hella test of Adam Smith's proposition that "there's a great deal of ruin in a nation."

Tuesday, November 18, 2025

Up, up, and away ...

Six hours on JetBlue, not so bad. A bit of the cattle car sensation, but better than some other airlines. Wonder if that competes successfully?

Then the more interesting bit: a Cape Air night flight in an eight seater to Martha's Vineyard. It was cold and clear and I got to sit behind where the co.pilot would have been, but there wasn't one.

Almost pleasant travel ...

Monday, November 17, 2025

Comically overcomplicated healthcare -- that can also be cruel

A heck of a way to get to a napkin ...
I know I don't understand US healthcare policy. That's in part because I am personally fortunate enough to enjoy a reasonable facsimile of access to adequate medical care via Medicare and the Kaiser Permanente system. 

And it is also because the whole thing is a "Rube Goldburg machine," defined by Wikipedia as "a chain reaction–type machine or contraption intentionally designed to perform a simple task in a comically overcomplicated way."

We can't seem to enact a better way, though I give Democrats credit for sporadically trying to get us there.

But I can refer here to Katelyn Jetelina and Hayden Rooke-Ley's totally lucid description of our mess at Your Local Epidemiologist, timed for the season when many of us have to make decisions about how we'll try to protect ourselves for another year.

5 ways our health care system has become utterly insane

1. Costs vs. wages: A 20-year disconnect. 

Over the past two decades, the cost of employer-sponsored health insurance—how the vast majority of privately insured Americans obtain their health care—has skyrocketed. Premiums, deductibles, and out-of-pocket costs have all soared—far faster than wages. ...

2. We pay the most and get the least.

The United States spends far more on health care than any other wealthy country yet achieves worse outcomes, less access, and a more demoralized workforce. ...

3. Americans don’t “overconsume” health care. Prices and private bloat drive costs.

There’s a common myth, especially amongst policymakers, that we spend too much on health care because we consume too much of it. A similar narrative has taken hold about doctors: because they get paid for each service, they provide too much care. Certainly, there is low-value care in the U.S. health care system. And as profit-seeking corporate actors own more and more of the system, they’re finding ways to bill for more—and more expensive—services.

But Americans don’t visit the doctor more, we don’t go to the hospital more, and we don’t stay in the hospital for longer. ...

4. Corporate and financial firms have taken over care. 

Perhaps the most underappreciated transformation of the past 40 years is the corporate consolidation and financialization of medicine. Care delivery—once local and community-based—is now dominated by corporations. ...

5. Existing approaches have failed—and the latest proposals are more of the same. 

None of this happened by coincidence. Our current governing approach began in the 1980s, when a bipartisan consensus emerged around how to address accelerating costs in the system. The idea was to embrace more free market principles in health care ...

If you want to take a stab at understanding why you hate your health insurance and sometimes even your medical providers, I can't recommend this article too highly. 

Sunday, November 16, 2025

Preparations for a looming invasion

Indivisible Brooklyn volunteers with the Hands Off NYC campaign handing out materials to defend neighborhoods from ICE. 
I love this photo. I haven't lived in New York for many years now, but I can still readily imagine this scene. New Yorkers are tough. They have to be. No wonder Donald hates them and the sentiment is reciprocated.

Saturday, November 15, 2025

Boycott Starbucks!

When we lack direct political power -- that is, have enough elected officials who stand for what we might believe in -- it is normal to turn to consumer power to make our point. This is a good impulse. How could I say otherwise as a veteran worker on the great farm worker grape boycott, back in the day?

In this moment of relative powerlessness we are encouraged to participate in plenty of consumer boycotts of firms that one way or another support the Trump regime: Tesla (that's easy for most of us), T-mobile, Amazon, Target. 

But here's another call for a boycott of a more traditional sort: workers are trying to unionize and win contracts at one of the most widely distributed consumer outlets in the country.

With more than a thousand Starbucks baristas on strike across 40 cities and growing, the No Kings Alliance is announcing its support for striking baristas and calling on consumers to pledge not to shop at Starbucks while baristas are on strike. 

For the last four years, Starbucks baristas have powered a historic, inspiring union organizing campaign, taking on one of the most powerful corporations in the world. Yet, the coffee giant continues to fight workers at every turn, cozying up to the anti-union Trump administration and racking up more federal labor law violations than any other corporation in U.S. history. 

Meanwhile, Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol was paid $96 million for just 120 days of work in 2024, paying himself 6,666 times what the average barista made — the worst CEO-to-worker pay inequity in the country. At the same time, Trump and his billionaire backers are doing their best to scare people out of speaking up for their rights on the job and in their communities. 

“We're sick of Starbucks executives seeking to lord over our workplaces, ignore our basic needs, and break labor law—all while the CEO makes millions. That's why we're on an unfair labor practice strike,” said Diego Franco, a Starbucks Workers United barista in Chicago. “Allies like the No Kings Alliance are helping power our movement forward, and we look forward to uniting together on the picket line.” 

Union baristas are demanding higher take-home pay, better hours to improve staffing in stores, and the resolution of hundreds of outstanding unfair labor practice charges for union busting.  

You can sign a boycott pledge here.

The barista role is too many peoples' entry level job these days. If that's to be the case, let's help these workers make it a good one! 

Friday, November 14, 2025

Roman Catholic bishops do right by immigrants

 

As pastors, we the bishops of the United States are bound to our people by ties of communion and compassion in Our Lord Jesus Christ. We are disturbed when we see among our people a climate of fear and anxiety around questions of profiling and immigration enforcement. We are saddened by the state of contemporary debate and the vilification of immigrants. We are concerned about the conditions in detention centers and the lack of access to pastoral care. We lament that some immigrants in the United States have arbitrarily lost their legal status. We are troubled by threats against the sanctity of houses of worship and the special nature of hospitals and schools. We are grieved when we meet parents who fear being detained when taking their children to school and when we try to console family members who have already been separated from their loved ones. ...

... To our immigrant brothers and sisters, we stand with you in your suffering, since, when one member suffers, all suffer (cf. 1 Corinthians 12:26). You are not alone!

We note with gratitude that so many of our clergy, consecrated religious, and lay faithful already accompany and assist immigrants in meeting their basic human needs. We urge all people of good will to continue and expand such efforts. 

We oppose the indiscriminate mass deportation of people. We pray for an end to dehumanizing rhetoric and violence, whether directed at immigrants or at law enforcement. We pray that the Lord may guide the leaders of our nation, and we are grateful for past and present opportunities to dialogue with public and elected officials. In this dialogue, we will continue to advocate for meaningful immigration reform. 

The Roman Catholic hierarchy is not where I am accustomed to look first for affirmation of universal human dignity. 

But the MAGA agenda of deportation and cruelty offends them and most of us. 

Here they speak bravely and broadly for compassion and justice. 

Thursday, November 13, 2025

The fury to come

 
Even the complicated, partial release of the Epstein files has revealed and confirmed enough to make decent women (and men) see red -- and should help push our mad king off his phony pedestal.

I don't know how this plays out in younger age groups, but casual sexual exploitation of very young women is all too recognizable to most women in my age group. These guys, these powerful men, just assumed that women's bodies existed for their pleasure. (In their eyes, we had no souls.) Least culpably, some merely leered without remorse at young women; many of the richest and most powerful felt entitled to molest.

Some women can only deal with our dehumanization by men by denying it happens. A small number aid the perpetrators. In my generation, a lot of us gave up on men, even those men who were not personally guilty, but who couldn't see the burden women carry under the male gaze. Most women just soldiered on, living on a hurtful battlefield that is barely recognized by their male peers, even the men they love. 

And, if the good women and men with any power have the strength to pursue the Epstein revelations and implications, the nation faces a protracted release of stifled fury and agonizing confusion, necessary but terribly painful. Thanks Donald.

Cartoon via The Guardian