Tuesday, October 30, 2018

On community and hate


In the wake of the Pittsburgh synagogue massacre, Tara Isabella Burton posed the question "Why [do] extremists keep attacking places of worship?" Before this crime, there were the murders at Emmanuel AME Church in Charleston, the attack on a Sikh temple in Wisconsin, the 2008 shootings at Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church ... the list goes on.

In these days of frantic campaigning, my quick reads of coverage of even the most dire events are little more than a skim. But I was struck by this:

... the attack on Tree of Life is part of another, wider, and no less worrying trend: the degree to which places of worship have become targets for acts that could be classified as domestic terrorism. In the past decade, houses of worship — from synagogues to Christian churches to Sikh temples — have increasingly become targets for extremist violence. Many of these attacks have been explicitly white supremacist or right-wing in nature, targeting perceived liberals, ethnic minorities, or women.

In each case, the attacks have been designed to maximize emotional effect. By targeting a house of worship, rather than a private home or business, the attacker has committed a powerful symbolic transgression: profaning a space that is both sacred and communal. Attacks on places of worship double not just as attacks on worshippers, but as attacks on the community itself.

In my haste, I read that last sentence as simply attacks on community itself -- not exactly what Burton is saying, but an implication very much there in her thought.

Do angry shooters vent their rage on people gathered in community because, somewhere in the reaches of their hate-addled brains, community itself is the enemy? People coming together for a purpose -- whether as a bowling club or to worship as they choose -- form communities, webs of human connection that sustain and enrich their humanity.

When rage comes to define individuals, human connection becomes difficult, maybe impossible. When elements of the cultural context excuse, even validate, white supremacy, anti-Semitism, and religious bigotry, do those who for whatever reason feel themselves outside community feel the need to attack community itself?

So it seems.

Evil leaders mobilize lonely losers for their own purposes. That's how we get fascism -- when the losers for whom community has long failed or been broken accept the leadership of one who offers the false community of shared resentment and hatred. Our webs of human connection, of communal purpose, are our deepest defense against collective evil.

1 comment:

Rain Trueax said...

I wonder if that's looking at the wrong end of the question. What if those already mentally ill for whatever reason, look for an excuse, and they find it with some kind of hate group. It then is an excuse not a reason.

It seems both sides of the political divide refuse to come together for answers-- like it doesn't have to be either guns or mental illness. It can be both, and we could go after reasonable gun control measures; but they wouldn't have helped with this guy apparently unless we could outlaw those AR-15s and their ilk. He'd have never turned his in even under threat of a fine. Mental illness though, given how neighbors describe his lifestyle, maybe that would've waved a red flag enough to get him force-ably tested. i know the Giffords shooting in Tucson could have been helped if that guy, who everybody knew was dangerously schizophrenic, could have been held and treated. They often don't want treatment. And I stipulate dangerously mentally ill as not all schizophrenics are-- only like 10%.

Always though the right wants to blame it on mental illness and the left wants it all about guns-- hence nothing happens and we end up with more innocents paying the price ;(. I suspect both sides in 'leadership' like it out there to keep their bases ginned up.. Kind of a cynical thought...