Monday, April 28, 2008

Those "harsh interrogation techniques"

Yesterday the New York Times reported:

"The fact that an act is undertaken to prevent a threatened terrorist attack, rather than for the purpose of humiliation or abuse, would be relevant to a reasonable observer in measuring the outrageousness of the act," said Brian A. Benczkowski, a deputy assistant attorney general, in the letter, which had not previously been made public. ...

It has been clear that the order preserved at least some of the latitude that Mr. Bush has permitted the C.I.A. in using harsher interrogation techniques than those permitted by the military or other agencies.

Like this:


Watch the video. Then go on over to Amnesty International's Unsubscribe Me site and sign the petition. Now.

Unsubscribe is a movement of people united against human rights abuses in the 'war on terror'. Thousands of unsubscribers have now joined up. The threat of terrorism is real, but trampling over human rights and abandoning our values is not the answer. From Guantanamo Bay, Rendition, Torture and Waterboarding -- we unsubscribe.



H/t Rachel from North London

1 comment:

sfwillie said...

The Roman Catholic Inquisitions tortured people with the purpose of saving their souls from eternal damnation;

There could be no higher purpose in the mind of a torturer;

Ergo: the Inquisitions were cool.

Thanks for beating this important drum.

Related Posts with Thumbnails